(July 2, 2018 at 2:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote:(July 2, 2018 at 1:35 pm)henryp Wrote: Milo texts that in response to being asked for a comment on a story, presumably by people he doesn't like. He didn't encourage anyone, as it was a text message to a single person. That reporter of course prints the statement, and frames it as a call to violence, even though Milo had no audience until the reporter gave the statement one.
He's a despicable person, but this is a bullshit story. And this is normal. Where things are shifted just enough so that they are now just 'based on a true story.'
"People he didn't like" was a journalist. Who, because they were asking for a comment on a story, was of course going to print it. It's not like Milo said this in joking confidence to some nobody. This was his comment upon request.
Let's not be deliberately obtuse here.
Did the story (there where asking him to comment on) have anything; that the comment could legitimately be confused as a response to. It seems to me, like people are grasping at straws.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
