RE: Forgot to change name!
July 16, 2018 at 5:35 pm
(This post was last modified: July 16, 2018 at 5:38 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(July 16, 2018 at 5:23 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(July 16, 2018 at 4:53 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: To be fair, Trump had already published a list of prospects. From the Left's perspective, judges endorsed by the Federalist Society would be interchangeable.
I agree, that it's actually not that big of deal. But still funny none the less... Especially when it was butchered that badly. However most of Trumps choices, seem to be conservative judges, by which I mean conservative in their view of proper judicial procedure and interpreting the constitution, as opposed to progressive and looking to re-write it from the bench. In which case their individual views should not come into play as much.
There are no conservative justices, only those who read the Constitution according to how it was meant to be read by those who wrote it and as it was passed into law. That's called non-partisan which is what the judiciary is supposed to be. Those who believe that the constitution requires interpretation, as opposed to its plain reading, are partisan left-wings activists.
<insert profound quote here>
