(July 17, 2018 at 8:56 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:(July 16, 2018 at 5:35 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: There are no conservative justices, only those who read the Constitution according to how it was meant to be read by those who wrote it and as it was passed into law. That's called non-partisan which is what the judiciary is supposed to be. Those who believe that the constitution requires interpretation, as opposed to its plain reading, are partisan left-wings activists.
In your expert opinion as a constitutional lawyer?
I'm sure it was a non-partisan, plain reading that resulted in a SC decision that effectively decided a presidential election but was in no way to be taken as the Court establishing a precedent.
