RE: "Jesus would rather kill, not marry, gay people" - Franklin Graham
July 23, 2018 at 1:40 pm
(This post was last modified: July 23, 2018 at 1:40 pm by polymath257.)
(July 23, 2018 at 1:30 pm)SteveII Wrote:(July 23, 2018 at 1:19 pm)polymath257 Wrote: It was NOT in *all* cases. There are counter-examples that have been pointed out to you.
And, besides, this is a *secular* marriage. We *do* get to decide how it is to be defined for *our society*. And the best definition to use is the one I gave.
Once again, do you object to the re-definition of 'person' to include corporate entities? Is that such a violation of previous definitions that it should not be allowed?
Do you mean the examples where there were multiple men and/or women? That was in no way support for your position. For example, in the case of one man multiple wives: were the women married to each other? NO. One person got married MULTIPLE times to the opposite sex. See the difference? No one screwed with the definition of marriage.
A corporation is only considered a person in the eyes of the law in certain circumstances. There is no one on the planet that things that a corporation is actually a person. Red Herring.
I disagree. The marriage between gays is a matter of law. That is all that is relevant. Whether *you* consider it to be a marriage is irrelevant as whether *you* consider a corporation to be a person.
The only question is whether gays should be allowed to enter into exactly the same legal agreements to have their bond legally recognized.
(July 23, 2018 at 1:37 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: You guys realize Steves just going to keep digging himself in deeper
Oh yes. But it can be fun to watch the digging.
