(August 27, 2018 at 9:25 am)alpha male Wrote:(August 27, 2018 at 8:42 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: You can double down on your prior characterization all you want, unless you can explain how doing so would be inconsistent with Mueller's mandate as special prosecutor then your characterization is baseless.
Thought the reasoning was obvious. If it's not political, he should release the results when he's satisfied that there complete. Things like Kavanaufh and Sessions aren't relevant.
When he's satisfied that what is complete? His mandate is far ranging and open ended. There is no specific endpoint. So your objection is unclear at best. Second, everything that anyone thinks is true is "obvious" to them. You and Neo seem to think saying that is sufficient to establish something as grounded. If you can't explain your reasoning better than that, you're not worth listening to, and are likely just a deluded partisan conflating "undesirable" with inappropriate or unethical. Mueller's mandate is to investigate and prosecute any crimes he discovers. If the latter part of that mandate provides incentives for filing specific charges at a specific time, so be it. When he first discovered information leading him to believe that Manafort was guilty of specific crimes, he didn't just simply stop. He pursued the matter until he was satisfied that he could successfully prosecute the matter. That is his mandate. I think you're confusing what is in the interest of yourself with what Mueller's interests should be.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)