Why not bold the bit that Brown actually started with?
You do realise that it's a news article being retracted, not the actual paper? They took it down because questions were raised over the methodology, and because they have a duty of care to their paying students they didn't want to report something that was now being called into question.
The fact that questions are raised about the methodology of the paper shows that the peer review process works.
Quote:In light of questions raised about research design and data collection related to Lisa Littman’s study on “rapid-onset gender dysphoria,” Brown determined that removing the article from news distribution is the most responsible course of action.
You do realise that it's a news article being retracted, not the actual paper? They took it down because questions were raised over the methodology, and because they have a duty of care to their paying students they didn't want to report something that was now being called into question.
The fact that questions are raised about the methodology of the paper shows that the peer review process works.
