(August 29, 2018 at 11:44 am)mh.brewer Wrote: I'll just put some things here.
The published study and comments: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl...#abstract0
Julia Serano response: https://medium.com/@juliaserano/everythi...40b8afdeba
Response to Julia Serano: http://gdworkinggroup.org/2018/08/27/res...l-reports/
WPATH: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Document...0WPATH.pdf
I would say that those are legitimate critiques and things to point out. But not reason to negate the previous peer review. One may note, that the conclusion of the original PLOS says that more study is needed.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
