RE: LGBT shuts down science
August 30, 2018 at 1:51 am
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2018 at 2:19 am by Pat Mustard.)
(August 29, 2018 at 8:46 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(August 29, 2018 at 8:40 am)Khemikal Wrote: Esoterica, but the cross on the shield is an affirmation of the university's "britishness" - fairly typical for Providence..Rhode Island.....1765.
ala-
Too right. It seems that if Brown was a religious school, it would be mentioned in their admission policies, or their mission statement or...something. As far as I can tell, it isn't.
And, for what it's worth, I attended two avowedly religious universities (Queens and Trinity) and obtained perfectly secular education at each one.
Boru
Did you shoot any catholics from the belltower while at Trinity?
(August 29, 2018 at 10:31 am)Tizheruk Wrote: Some valid methodological objections to the study
Quote:* The study was based on parental reporting rather than evidence from the children themselves.
* The study was advertised, and participants were collated from websites who are well known to be anti-trans and was not representative of the general population. The published research into “rapid onset gender dysphoria” consists entirely of one 2017 abstract of an online survey of 164 parents sourced from anti-trans groups!
* There are no clinical features of “ROGD” that have been identified to distinguish it from the traditional form of dysphoria.
* What appears to a parent to be a “rapid” onset may not have been rapid for their child at all, as it is based wholly on parental reports
* There is no evidence presented to support the claim that children became gender dysphoric as a result of social coercion.
Not mention the study has issues in regards to the null hypothesis .
The original study (though the whole things appears to be an abstract that sets off some serious red flags )
https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-...0/fulltext
Here's Trans group against the study and there case for why they object to the study on scientific grounds unlike Beta's false framing of the issue .
https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2018...nk-science
So it's Regnerus mark 2 then. Whell what did I expect when am's criteria for scientific validity being "if the nazis would have usedit then it's good, unless it goes against the bible or big business".
(August 29, 2018 at 11:24 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: When your intellect fails you, make up a straw man to knock down.
You wouldn't want to hurt yourself.
Stop talking about yourself in company. It's not polite.