If theists understood "evidence"

[Amarok]

I’m not the one is avoiding discussion. But I’m not going to keep going back and forth like this. If you decide that you want to support your statements, rather than run away from them, I’ll be here. I am interested in why you think this. 

Have a good day!

Your only interested in playing apologist games till everyone's sick of debunking your nonsense or arguing in circles with you then just walks away. Only to then have proclaim a fake victory then try it all over again. Sorry your song and dance got old ages ago no matter how much you try and pretend to "just be curious" the smoke screen has long faded and the apologist preacher in sheep's clothing is clear as day.

---

Would it be fair to say then, that it is not so much about evidence, but an a priori belief, and/or personal incredulity?

That which is personal should be kept as such rather than blurted as universal.

After all, how does personal become universal except through an agenda?

Ah trying his "this isn't really about evidence line " or worst disparately to shift the burden onto you because he has nothing .