(October 9, 2018 at 2:35 pm)adey67 Wrote:(October 9, 2018 at 1:28 pm)Drich Wrote: what the f do you know I have NEVER even spoken to you about anything at length.. all you could possible know is what the people here whom I have repeatedly and systematical taken apart over the years.
Are you too frighten to put your own self out there to think for your self? are you so afraid of being humiliated that you will allow others to do your thinking for you? you have 30 posts and what a few day here, with no real inneraction with me, yet you speak as an expert.
That my friend is a shinning example of a disingenuous and dishonest assessment. you have no debate experience with me and yet you speak as if you do.
yet you do not care. because integrity means nothing to you or people like you. you see a band wagon and you jump on it rather than get your own hands dirty.. you sport are a human lemming. You just follow the crowd and mirror what they think even if they all jump off a cliff.
That said here is another place where you are wrong. Pride in God is never a sin. I have made no bones about where my wisdom comes from, and I know I would be nothing without the guidance of the Holy Spirit and direct access to God. My pride is in the fact that He would use me to set his record straight here. And in following in the foot steps of Christ I have no qualms in humiliating, embarrassing, the religious know it alls here I have no problem making the wise and learned look foolish and I have no problems putting people who pretend to teach or represent God's law in full check.
Do you want to know why I've been here so long and why I have over 10,000 posts? because 1 I can and do operate with n the rules. 2 I make a legitimate effort to accurately represent the Christian side of the debate. Just because none of your peers could ever breach that wall is not about me or my ability. it because they are foolishly arguing against God's word. I have simply been used as one who wields this sword.
You know maybe you should also put me on ignore so you do not have to ever respond and loose, then if you stick around you can say you never lost a debate with me.
Actually christian hatred is the OP of this thread. I simply tied what you said back to the topic being discussed.
meaning what I said above... christians can not hate or literally by God's word they are not saved. Hence Hate is a human problem not a christian problem
Ha Ha Ha, nope, I don't think I'll put you on ignore you're too fucking amusing, anyone who needs to invoke how long they have been here and how many posts they have made in comparison to me and who gets so butt hurt by a newbie sniffing them out is actually clearly seriously bothered by what I said and if I was so insignificant then why even bother responding oh prideful one ? BTW its lose not loose, if you're gonna go head to head with others spelling is important, its my experience that the more angry a person gets and the more disturbed they feel then the more likely they are to make typos and spelling mistakes. Truth is you do not like being contradicted you cannot abide the thought of a world without a magical deity and you cannot stand that perhaps there are people who don't believe there is a god, their disbelief offends you and makes you feel insecure and the anger boils up.
I thank you though, I'm learning so much from you, as in what not to do or how not to be, thanks so much for that I really appreciate it.
So that's all you got? You whole methodology of my destruction is pointing out how you think my butt feels and spelling and grammar errors... I notice you never mentioned content.. wonder why. Oh, that's right, because that is a thinking man's approach and you already demonstrated that you want others to do your thinking for you IE: declaring who I was based on how the butts of your peers feel after years of failing to silence me. Noice nuub.. The reason I mention your limited time here is because there has been no interaction between us in your first 30 post and you have the wherewithal to speak of me from first person perspective, which again you do not have. This again is evidence displaying that you allow others to develop opinions for you, which is also why your declaration above is limited to 'grading papers for spelling and punctuation errors.' (you do not seem to be smart enough to address topical points.) Only ad hom fire from the side lines. I do not foresee you role here (judging by your current involvement) to be much more than a waldorf/mortimore puppet/sock of some other douche who doesn't want their name tarnished by me by attacking me head on.. rather use you to test out different attacks.
I look forward to putting you back in check each and every time you feel the need to parrot back one of your peers thoughts about me.
