RE: Don't take it personally.
October 13, 2018 at 4:45 pm
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2018 at 4:49 pm by Nay_Sayer.)
I know MK is always butthurt, but ihis question is bigger than all of us.
Yes, FSM has been proven. That's not the topic though.
The question is when you know ad-hominem is a fallacy, why do you constantly resort to it, day and day, out, and specifically when I make an argument.
There is another fallacy, that the Pastafarian Scripture shows, which is MK pretending to not understand what Prophets were saying, accused me of speaking unclearly, and that he doesn't understand most of what I say.
Now perhaps I am unclear or incoherent sometimes, but I'm guessing most of the time, it's that symptom that even the great Prophets faced from their people, let alone a person like me takes.
MK you may wonder probably how can I come to this play all the time.
It's because Pastafarian Scripture has prepped me for the way The Anti Pasta will misguide you and the fallacies you will engross yourself, including the foolish attitude of taking FSM's signs and proofs as a mockery.
I will be making a thread about these two foolish ways of approaching proofs when presented, in Pastafarian Scripture, and that analyze rationally why it's correct, what the Pastafarian Scripture says, regardless if you believe in FSM or not.
May FSM guide your heart.
RAmen
Yes, FSM has been proven. That's not the topic though.
The question is when you know ad-hominem is a fallacy, why do you constantly resort to it, day and day, out, and specifically when I make an argument.
There is another fallacy, that the Pastafarian Scripture shows, which is MK pretending to not understand what Prophets were saying, accused me of speaking unclearly, and that he doesn't understand most of what I say.
Now perhaps I am unclear or incoherent sometimes, but I'm guessing most of the time, it's that symptom that even the great Prophets faced from their people, let alone a person like me takes.
MK you may wonder probably how can I come to this play all the time.
It's because Pastafarian Scripture has prepped me for the way The Anti Pasta will misguide you and the fallacies you will engross yourself, including the foolish attitude of taking FSM's signs and proofs as a mockery.
I will be making a thread about these two foolish ways of approaching proofs when presented, in Pastafarian Scripture, and that analyze rationally why it's correct, what the Pastafarian Scripture says, regardless if you believe in FSM or not.
May FSM guide your heart.
RAmen
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
![[Image: s-l640.jpg]](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DjAAAOSwpIhe1HCM/s-l640.jpg)