This constant testification thing to Atheism, is not gonna work lol, because you guys yourself say the burden of proof is on Theists, so that means you are just constantly testifying based on not seeing whether there are proofs or not.
While being unconvinced can be a fault of the conveyer or the proofs, I believe, in this case, the fault is the receivers, and the constant short non-thinking remarks proves it where as when anyone get's deeply into discussions, they tend to resort after a while to fallacies or won't address one of the mini-proofs for the premises that is disputed or won't address a key question.
So I'm convinced - that your constant denial, is meaningless.
While being unconvinced can be a fault of the conveyer or the proofs, I believe, in this case, the fault is the receivers, and the constant short non-thinking remarks proves it where as when anyone get's deeply into discussions, they tend to resort after a while to fallacies or won't address one of the mini-proofs for the premises that is disputed or won't address a key question.
So I'm convinced - that your constant denial, is meaningless.
