(October 15, 2018 at 11:55 am)MysticKnight Wrote: This constant testification thing to Atheism, is not gonna work lol, because you guys yourself say the burden of proof is on Theists, so that means you are just constantly testifying based on not seeing whether there are proofs or not.
While being unconvinced can be a fault of the conveyer or the proofs, I believe, in this case, the fault is the receivers, and the constant short non-thinking remarks proves it where as when anyone get's deeply into discussions, they tend to resort after a while to fallacies or won't address one of the mini-proofs for the premises that is disputed or won't address a key question.
So I'm convinced - that your constant denial, is meaningless.
Do you actually believe that you have ever presented an argument for the existence of God which should convince a fair and impartial observer? I'm not looking for a kind-of, sort-of argument. I mean an argument that is rock solid. If so, I never saw it. Mostly they have been verbose but vague and entirely unconvincing.
When we say the burden is on you, that is only if you think we should agree with you. You are entitled to go on believing whatever you like for whatever reasons you choose for yourself. That you can think you've ever presented a sufficient argument for others to agree with you just shows you are deluding yourself at least about that.
What we are not asking for is more and longer arguments of an insufficient kind. When you pile them up, you just annoy us and we stop reading them. There is no argument I can conceive of which could possibly convince anyone who isn't already convinced that the undetectable exists. So give it up.
