Hey man! No calling non sequitur when I'm employing sarcasm. That's me saying YOUR argument is a non sequitur. 
Tbh, I didn't really understand the simplex/duplex thing, so I was just spitballin' there.
Arguably, formal logic is dependant on some social context. But maybe you have a point there too. The rest, I'll get back to you on.

Tbh, I didn't really understand the simplex/duplex thing, so I was just spitballin' there.
Arguably, formal logic is dependant on some social context. But maybe you have a point there too. The rest, I'll get back to you on.