RE: Mary's Ten Year Pregnancy
November 30, 2018 at 12:32 pm
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2018 at 12:38 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(November 30, 2018 at 10:58 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(November 29, 2018 at 4:06 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Richard Carrier's a shill.
He wasn't interested in the historicity of Jesus untill athiest groups started giving him money, and according to his own blog he was desperate for money...
http://richardcarrier.blogspot.com/2008/...ctors.html
Do you even logic? No one is interested in your ad hominem arguments, Huggy. Show where the arguments are wrong or shove off.
Do you bother to think before you speak? The majority of historians agree that Jesus existed, so why would I have to disprove a fringe theorist?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Quote:Virtually all New Testament scholars and Near East historians, applying the standard criteria of historical investigation, find that the historicity of Jesus is effectively certain
Quote:While scholars have criticized Jesus scholarship for religious bias and lack of methodological soundness,[nb 8] with very few exceptions such critics generally do support the historicity of Jesus and reject the Christ myth theory that Jesus never existed.
(November 30, 2018 at 11:24 am)Minimalist Wrote: Huggy, you dumb fuck, Carrier knows more history in his little toe than you know in your whole useless body. And he knows your godboy jesus isn't "historical." Sucks to be you but then that is your choice isn't it?
Nah, he just found he could make a career out of finessing gullible atheists like yourself.
