(January 13, 2019 at 3:08 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(January 13, 2019 at 2:42 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Gotta love whataboutism.
It's for the people to decide not a fanatical atheist cult.
The people DID decide, which you'd know if you'd read the article. And they can continue to decide - anyone in that town, anyone in the WORLD can decide to go visit Ken Ham's attractions, no harm no foul. FFRF has never stopped anyone from going to the Ark thingy or the Creation thingy. What they did was to remind the town that it is unconstitutional for a government agency to sponsor religious activities. And the town agreed. No one got sued, no one had their religious freedoms trampled. In fact, the case could be made that FFRF did the town a favour by helping them avoid a (potentially) costly lawsuit.
This sort of thing was settled in 1789. Keep up.
Boru
It wasn't a "religious event." It was a field trip. Bunch of idiots whining about others going out and doing something. It would've been a "religious event" if the government said they had to go and accept what was shared.
Never been to the Museum, probably won't ever go, but if I ever choose to and some nutty whackjob group told me I couldn't go, they wouldn't like what would come next. Same thing if I wanted to visit an atheist church. I would decide, not let someone tell me I can't because their feelings might get hurt.
I tell ya, these nutty atheist groups and going to get us all enslaved with their constant badgering everybody and trying to tell "We the People" what to think. We can think for ourselves.
Also, please don't assume this is being suggested at all atheists. There are many that are kind and don't spread this mindless hate garbage.
