(January 13, 2019 at 6:14 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 13, 2019 at 5:38 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: They ARE free to go if they choose. No one is stopping them. The issue isn't whether people can take a religious holiday - of course they can, they have a constitutionally protected right to do so. The government DOES ensure that they are free to go if they choose.
It isn't about the park and the museum. It isn't about Ken Ham being a world-class dimwit. It isn't about the right of people to go to these attractions. It's about a local government violating the establishment clause. That's all.
Boru
It's not violating anything. It's nuts claiming it does. If people want to go, they have the right to go. Now if they demanded you go, then there would be a problem if you don't want to go, but those people clearly were interested in going. Makes no difference if it was a museum or an atheist church.
I hate to lecture people about their own countries, but you have a constitutional amendment a HUGE amount of case law prohibiting just this sort of thing.
You understand that people can still go to the museum, right?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
