RE: FFRF is pissing off Ham and the Christians..... again.
January 13, 2019 at 9:35 pm
(This post was last modified: January 13, 2019 at 9:41 pm by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(January 13, 2019 at 9:00 pm)wyzas Wrote:(January 13, 2019 at 4:03 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: It is "logical fallacy" not "accuracy."
Not in this instance.
Well if you agreed that's what it is, and it's defined by such, then obviously it's a logical fallacy. Or do you get a special exception to using logical fallacies, so that you can say they don't count?
(January 13, 2019 at 9:07 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: It's a fallacy to claim a fallacy and not show why you believe it's a fallacy.
Ummm, no. Where did you come up with that?
Anyway, he already acknowledged it, but apparently believes it deserves some sort of exception.
