(January 21, 2019 at 1:35 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:Yes, you are avoiding something: the fact that this is a constitutional issue, which is how FFRF correctly lodged their complaint.(January 21, 2019 at 8:41 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: As I have pointed out above, you have still not defended your views upon constitutional grounds. Again, you have engaged in Red-baiting to avoid the real issue. It is unconstitutional for the national, state or local governments to fund or promote religion in any form. Ken Ham's Ark Museum is clearly an institution promoting the theological premises of Creationism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment_Clause
Dude, stop your crying. I don't owe you anything and I haven't avoided anything. There are other people I have been trying to respond to, so trying to appease you is about the least of my concerns. You seem to do this in all the threads. Tell people they've made some error, while at the same time being lazy and never producing anything of your own to suggest otherwise. But hey, if you really think I'm not trying to engage the material, then I would be happy to do a 1-on-1 debate with you, so you can end your fits of pandering and get the attention you seem to think I owe you. Just let me know. If not, go back to the end of the line where you and your nonsense belong. In other words, "Go back to the shadow. You shall not pass"
Yes, I have presented evidence to support this.
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment means that neither state, local or national government may take any actions which advance or prohibit religion, or prefer one religion over another.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment_Clause
There is no reason for a 1-on-1 debate. Address the real issue. If anyone is pandering here, it's YOU.
"The world is my country; all of humanity are my brethren; and to do good deeds is my religion." (Thomas Paine)