(February 18, 2019 at 11:48 pm)Lek Wrote: [quote pid='1885958' dateline='1550547716']No. I'm not any of those. What I'm saying is that you don't know what that "energy" is, but because of your limited worldview you automatically rule out that this energy could have created the universe rather than have become it. You exist in a box and will not wander beyond its boundaries.
[/quote]
1) "What I'm saying is that you don't know what that "energy" is.. "
What that 'Energy' was.... That cooled, expanded and coalessed into the electons, protons and neutrons wich further combined into the first hydrogen and helium (Possibly lithium?) barium (Pretty sure that's right) matter which (After sorting out the matter/anitmatter thing) further condensed/collapsed into the first suns... etc....
2) "But because of your limited worldview you automatically rule out..."
Uhm... please don't post/do things like that. Telling others what they think is often seen as rather rude.
3) "That this energy could have created the universe rather than have become it."
Y'see. This sentence doesn't actually make sense. You can't be the source/beggining of something as well as actually 'Being' said something.
The whole 'What came before we know of the early energy' bit/point is the things people are still thinking/poking about.
4) "You exist in a box and will not wander beyond its boundaries."
Remeber point '2'? Yah, you're doing that point again. You really don't want to be that point.
Not at work.
