(February 27, 2019 at 10:43 am)Drich Wrote: Look at mr thunder cat.. If I were so inepth why have I been correcting his understanding of the church for over a week? EVERYTHING this guy thought about the 1st century church the bible how it was translated was totally wrong.. but at the end all this douche has to say is I'm stupid and he can reset all the wrong stuff he orginally believed and you would gladly return to his side in support..
Now is it because I am ignorant here? or is the sentiment assigned to me so that you all do not have to change what or how you think about the church?
You know?... I was going to just ignore this, but to heck with it.
You systematically failed to understand the difference between the tradition in which Peter was the first head of the Catholic Church, and the (let's grant it, likely) reality in which Paul was the main driver behind the early growth of Christianity.
I've said this, in other words, of course, many times... and what did you do? whine about Mark being Peter's scribe (with nothing to back that claim, except some 2nd century attribution).
And yet, you claim I'm the crazy and ignorant one?...
(February 27, 2019 at 10:43 am)Drich Wrote: Truthfully look at the crazy stuff he has said and what I had to do to correct him.. all the resources and all the reference material I used to support my work.. what did thundercat have? nothing more than what he thought and his 'word.' and for 3 days with supporting material I was treated as the ignorant one! why? if I can completely support my position? becuse it is a lie you all have to believe inorder to stay with what you believe about God and the church.
Well then, mister sunflower, support your god without a book.
Go ahead, I'll wait...
You know what?... Wait over! Heck, you even call the guy "god of the bible".

Your work is comparable to the millions of man-hours that have been dedicated to analyzing The Lord of the Rings. Sure, people can say much about hobbits, elves, orcs, wizards, etc... and can draw some inferences from all of their behaviors and interactions... but, ultimately, they are creatures in a book.