(April 28, 2019 at 8:03 am)emilsein Wrote: Can you explain why The Bible explained it as an eclipse according to wikipedia, which I'm not not trusting any of the shit I've been reading onlnie, why the hell would NASA even say it was an eclipse on his day of death in ad 33? can anyone look up eclipse data and see if this is bs but in the wiki It appears that Luke's Gospel originally explained the event as an eclipse. The majority of manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke have the Greek phrase eskotisthe ho helios ("the sun was darkened"), but the earliest manuscripts say tou heliou eklipontos ("the sun's light failed" or "the sun was in eclipse").[14] This earlier version is likely to have been the original one, amended by later scribes to correct what they assumed was an error, since they knew that an eclipse was impossible during Passover.[15][16] One early Christian commentator even suggested that the text had been deliberately corrupted by opponents of the Church to make it easier to attack.[17]
In the account of the crucifixion given in the Gospel of John[18] there is no mention of darkness, the tearing of the veil, or the raising of the dead.[19]
The bible is a book of mythology. It is NOT a science textbook.
