RE: Not just catholics!
May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2019 at 10:22 am by Drich.)
(May 10, 2019 at 7:38 am)LastPoet Wrote: Drich. He is the reincarnation of Job (didI get ghe character right?), had all the shit on the world throwed at him. Got AIDS, Cancer etc, now has been molested.
There is nothing that hasn't afflicted him
(May 9, 2019 at 7:19 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: You are even more twisted than I had previously thought.
Try to do a read on his threads. You might find thst this latest, isn't even the worst. Search his threads on the profile. If you are willing to feel brain pain, OFC. Heh, look for "spare the rod, spoil the child" i hope he never fathers children.
Ive shared this several times where have you been?
Again morons I am not condoning rape, it is not "fun". I am simply questioning it's position on the pop morality scale giving how dependant human survival as a species depended on rape to ensure bio diversity in the genepool. I honestly think the only reason you all see it so badly is because it is not fun for both people. if it where then it would be dismissed.
Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?
If 1/2 of you where honest 1/2 of you would say no. why? because rape/child molesting is not the issue, if it where then all form of sexually deviant behavior that could technically be defined as rape should get the max penalty.
If you said No you are not concerned with rape but concerned on how one 'feels' about sex with a given person.
Next scenario, lets say an older married couple have sex once or twice a week and it's" goodie bag night" but the wife is just not into it tonight for whatever reason. she explains this to her husband but he has already "taken the blue pill and wants to see how far the rabbit hole goes." ( a matrix quote nasto) so her 'feelings or want to abstain for a night go unheard and dude on his 'blue pill powers' drills wifie in the can for an hour. Or better yet let's say wifie is a light touch and she is done in 5 mins, and wants out... but dude on the blue pill is a 1 or 2 hour guy. Again she's done, and wants out but has to be hammered for another hour and 55 mins before the blue pill runs out and he is done.
Now according to your screw up pop morality which scenario is worse? two kids having consentual sex or a married couple having "taking one for the team sex?" Remember the husband and wife is not technically rape but at the same time the wife is having sex she does not really want twice a week till he gives out. and the kids no matter how much they want it, it is technically rape.
