(October 11, 2011 at 9:34 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: Here's the problem though - I don't understand if you're arguing the name of the organization or the fact that they offer abortion at all. If it's just the name you're objecting to, because it has stigma attached to it, the stigma exists solely because of religion. Science even does not claim to tell a person when exactly "life" begins. And that is the problem of the religious, not the secular. The religious have no problem using those services regardless of the name when they have issues, so why do they continue to attach the stigma to it at all?I don't accept that at all sweetums. Why does the stigma only apply to the religious?? It's only science that informs us when exactly life begins. Philosophically we decide when to call that life a person, and for some a person exists from conception... no religious strings attached *waves hands above person to show there are no strings*
We've already dismissed bigotry. Of course poor people need the assistance with abortion regardless of their beliefs. Why shouldn't a person get to hold an opinion on this because of that??