RE: Not just catholics!
May 13, 2019 at 11:09 am
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2019 at 11:14 am by Drich.)
(May 11, 2019 at 1:35 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(May 10, 2019 at 12:36 pm)Drich Wrote: what a douche..Do you really think im concerned about what a piece of shit like you thinks about me? If so, then you are a stupid piece of shit.
You: Unga bunga (caveman sounds) me no like what drich say, but me not know how to say it.. Me know Him religionous, so me make him look bad by showing me better than relionous..
Hey retard.. what religion do you think it is I am quoting? then what makes you think I am religious? or do you not understand the term as it is properly used and defined?
nothing I said has any religious implication to it.
It is simply a matter of perspective.
Looking from anothier perspective.....you are still a piece of shit.
piece of shit must like be the penultimate insult at the zoo.
How about this hot rod.. how about rather than just being offended and start name calling everytime you get verbally smacked for falling a sleep at the intellectual wheel, how about trying to leave a topical Or if you are confused or don't know what I am talking about ASK A QUESTION post once in a while. how about not bailing on a topic just because the subject gets too deep for once. how about put yourself in danger of seeing a different perspective once in a while. I am far more forgiving and will answer any and all questions happily explain things if you just ask.. but if you want to have a word smack down I'm good with that too.
(May 11, 2019 at 11:54 am)Nomad Wrote:(May 10, 2019 at 4:17 pm)Amarok Wrote: So advocating pedophilia then and no there are no "very mature 10 year olds " and if he enjoyed it it's only because he doesn't understand that he's just been violated sexually . The fact Derpch thinks this is any kind of moral dilemma is shameful .
You know, in my job, I've actually seen reports on shit like what Dripshit just described. And I can tell you right here and now that there is no way in hell where what Dripshit said doesn't constitute rape. Now the circumstances of the girl would have to be taken into account before passing judgement (maybe she too was raped herself, maybe she was raised by a religious bastard like Dripshit and her morality warped, maybe she's not capable of making an informed adult decision herself), but what she did in the hypothetical is a crime.
And what about the husband and wife team? is he guilty of rape?
Why do you guys only answer one or the other and never both?
(May 13, 2019 at 9:40 am)WolfsChild Wrote:(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote: Ive shared this several times where have you been?
Again morons I am not condoning rape, it is not "fun". I am simply questioning it's position on the pop morality scale giving how dependant human survival as a species depended on rape to ensure bio diversity in the genepool. I honestly think the only reason you all see it so badly is because it is not fun for both people. if it where then it would be dismissed.
Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?
If 1/2 of you where honest 1/2 of you would say no. why? because rape/child molesting is not the issue, if it where then all form of sexually deviant behavior that could technically be defined as rape should get the max penalty.
If you said No you are not concerned with rape but concerned on how one 'feels' about sex with a given person.
Next scenario, lets say an older married couple have sex once or twice a week and it's" goodie bag night" but the wife is just not into it tonight for whatever reason. she explains this to her husband but he has already "taken the blue pill and wants to see how far the rabbit hole goes." ( a matrix quote nasto) so her 'feelings or want to abstain for a night go unheard and dude on his 'blue pill powers' drills wifie in the can for an hour. Or better yet let's say wifie is a light touch and she is done in 5 mins, and wants out... but dude on the blue pill is a 1 or 2 hour guy. Again she's done, and wants out but has to be hammered for another hour and 55 mins before the blue pill runs out and he is done.
Now according to your screw up pop morality which scenario is worse? two kids having consentual sex or a married couple having "taking one for the team sex?" Remember the husband and wife is not technically rape but at the same time the wife is having sex she does not really want twice a week till he gives out. and the kids no matter how much they want it, it is technically rape.
Having forced sex is rape no matter if your married or not the wife can call the police and get him done for rape it will stand as that by law it is rape
ok... care to answer the other half of the scenario? two kids having consesentual sex is this not also rape? The law says it is, what says your pop moral standard?
