(May 20, 2019 at 8:19 am)Mathilda Wrote:(May 20, 2019 at 7:32 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I find it more than a little (sneaky? disingenuous?) of Forbes to mention that Chu is a Nobel laureate, but fail to mention that he's NOT an economist. He's a physicist and a good one, but does that qualify him to pontificate about the world economy?
I wouldn't say that it completely disqualifies him because economies can be understood in terms of thermodynamics.
That's fair, but I think that describing someone as a 'Nobel laureate' in an article about the economy when he's not a laureate in economics is a little underhanded.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax


