(May 23, 2019 at 11:06 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(May 23, 2019 at 9:27 am)Drich Wrote: the above statement is another straw man fallacy. As I never once ask if an adult raping a child was rape. That subject was never part of any discussion and I never even questioned the legality.
(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote: Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?
What else than a child do you consider a 10y old boy to be?
Do you think 10y old boys should be able to decide to have sex or not?
what do you consider an adult to be? because my senerio place two under age children deciding to have sex.
That is what is wrong with you monsters. you try and seek out your own deviant traits and assign them to me or what I said.
why in the wrld would you assume the 10 year old is having sex with an adult unless that is the only way you can see it happening.. which again is something you brought to the discussion.
My scenario had one child marginally older than the other and STILL YOU F-ING MORON I IDENTIFIED IT AS RAPE, AND THEN ASKED, SHOULD THE OLDER CHILD BE PROSECUTED AS AN ADULT!!!!
Do you get it?!?!? the rape was never in question from the beginning! That is a produce of another one of your sexually deviant peers who can not see or answer the scenario I provided but invented his own so he could involve himself without having to think outside of the box he was comfortable in!.
The question was always should the older child in this case a girl be made a sex offender/child predator for the rest of her life! on top of a prision sentence!!! not is a 10 year old having sex rape.
