RE: Not just catholics!
May 24, 2019 at 11:58 am
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2019 at 12:28 pm by Drich.)
(May 23, 2019 at 10:53 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:Quote:Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?
Yes, she should. Gee, that was tough.
Once again, Drich the good Christian, showing himself to be the most vile, immoral member of the forum. Child rape apologizing is a new low for you, man. I’m pretty happy with my pop morality that doesn’t condone adults having sex with ten year olds, you sick fuck.
where was this answer a week ago? or the first time you address this... Oh, that's right you can now see where I am going and know how to answer so you can feign moral superiority..
what happened to the other 1/2 of the question? didn't understand how to answer that one?
(May 23, 2019 at 4:44 pm)madog Wrote:I broke you...(May 23, 2019 at 4:34 pm)Drich Wrote: why not? I debate with all you all the time.
Rape and Sexual Offences - Chapter 2: Sexual Offences Act 2003 - Principal Offences, and Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Most commonly charged offences
Section 8: Causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity
Section 8 makes it an offence for a person intentionally to cause or incite a child (B) under the age of 13 to engage in sexual activity.
Or are you just 'touched?'
look again at what the senerio is:
Quote:Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?
Hey stupid do you understand now?
Look at the highlighted portion douche...
Drich Wrote: by every measure of the law this is rape,
Those are my words So why would I need a definition? oh that's right I don't... you do. you need to keep reminding yourself this is wrong so your own personal feeling don't spill out on page! Why else would you need to keep tellng yourself in an open forum that having sex with a 10 year old is rape? Because again no one is disputing it! i identify it from the very first post as rape! So again this defination must be for you
(May 23, 2019 at 9:22 pm)Fireball Wrote: Trying to decide if drich is just that stupid, or a troll. I guess in the end, the only difference is bannage. I don't read the slavering drivel, but camon, people. at some point the chew toy is so saturated with spittle that it's not even worth a sniff. Amirite?
slavery? what post or thread are you responding to?
How is it you are not a troll seriously? you don't even have a clue as to the nature of the topic yet you have at least 3 personal insults here directed atme.
Here's some home work for you "smart guy" (IF I am stupid and everything I say is dumb and smart is the opposite of that, I guess that makes you the 'smart guy.')
So 'smart guy" who can not see his own hypocrisy/trolldom staring at him in his own face! I've got a home work assignment for you. (If you have any desire not showing as a hypocrite/troll) how about read a few posts before you just shite all over a thread you know little to nothing about outside of your peers being pwned and bleating for someone to help them save face...
