(June 19, 2019 at 6:08 am)Belaqua Wrote: Do you think women shouldn't be trusted?
Yeah, especially those that believe in magic. Church rejected Bruno because he agreed with Copernicus which was against the Bible and thus they felt it was against them. Just as Pope Pius XII in 1950 was against evolution because it was against Chruch's teachings, so he wrote in his encyclical Humani Generis:
Quote:When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism [our descent from ancestors beyond Adam and Eve], the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains that either after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which, through generation, is passed on to all and is in everyone as his own.
(June 19, 2019 at 6:08 am)Belaqua Wrote: But it's pure ideology to pretend that it's simply religion against science.
So how do you call this?
![[Image: trum.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/VvxPh4N5/trum.jpg)
https://shareblue.com/trump-end-medical-...al-tissue/
What are religious people here against if not science? Are they against human beings? Or against health? Where is that religious pro science agenda now?