trump announces his bid for reelection!

[The Grand Nudger]

The mueller report, as you have been shown with an actual citation in this thread, does not show what you said it does.  Further, it explicitly states that your characterization is wholly false.

My confusion is as to what fantasy world you're living in, but given that your "citations" are fox infotainment..that;s not quite right, huh?  More to how I could possibly discuss the merits of our respective opinions if you will not agree to contain yourself to the reality that facts obtain.

I already told you I wasn't interested in Qanon shit. I don't care whether it's you or lindsey graham or devin nunes mainlining that shit, lol.  You said the mueller report showed something, you said you had citations.  Neither of these two things were true.

The report has been edited by the federal government. meaning large portions have been completely omited or blacked out in compliance with federal law concerning the animinity of people or subjects under investigation or people or tactics used to gain information that is not to be share with the gener public as a matter of nation security (names of agents and spies working on the investigation ect) along with people and subject matters under current investigation... do you understand this part?

I provided you a video link of senator gramm telling us the Dossier and everyone involved in providing and pushing said dossier are under current investigation. which means all of that infor has been redacted. or black out/omitted from the public version of the muller report.
do you understand this? If you don'tit means your new times version is incomplete and you nor I am privy to the complete version. only members of congress and the senate with DOJ have access to most of the redacted portions, as even some of the report is not even open to them. Under normal circumstances the primary source the citable material would be the report. however under this circumstance the report is known to be incomplete and classified under the guise of the federal government. it is a state secret. Therefore the next legally quotable citable source would be from someone of authority who has read it.

That is what I did and that is what becomes your citation because no other legal information is available.

which is why i provided a video of a senator that has seen the redacted portions. and from what he is allowed to share he said he knew trump was innocent as the findings show the dossier to be false. Then I provided a cnn video that indicated the investigation showed the report to be manufactured by Christopher steele with the help of false info gained from the russians, yet use by the DNC as the primary evidence to start this investigation.

Then I provided a video link with a former DOJ that said the investigation should have stopped when the dossier which was the foundation of the whole investigation into TRUMP was found to be false. And that is what is being investigated now. who knew what andwhen.

So again I do not understand you confusion unless you are intentionally trolling me and the subject because you simply want the last word on something that is in the works and is playing out right now exactly as I described.

either way even if you don't understand still.. know I am on the side of history and there is an on going investigation on the dossier and everyone involved in it's production and illegal use to turn the DOJ onto an american citizen and president with manufactured evidence.

You're not providing a citation.  

You're giving me excuses for why you don't have what you claimed to have, why it wasn't where you claimed it would be, why the mueller report didn't show what you said it did, and why you feel no need to contain yourself to the reality that facts obtain.