comfort is comfort, especially at the end of a life. If anti-theism has a problem with theistic flavored comfort, due to it's long term impact on the individual or societal impact that's absolute crap because this is at the end of an individual's life. It has limited to no impact on the short remaining life of the dying and little if no societal impact outside of euthanasia laws. I see every third church in this town has a grief counseling meeting (some more secular and some less). I see pastor, parishioners, staff and church members doing tons of things (meals, visits, driving, etc) for widows and families suffering. How is this top down community of compassionate support for those grieving a bad thing?
(July 7, 2019 at 11:09 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote:Since the Church has recognized that exploiting fears is a bad way to motivate and is attempting different methods, I would recon that this is the improved theism you're talking about. I agree that railing against a theistic system by use of the same fears of "you can't do this or you'll get sued" or "you must include me because I'm a privileged minority", is slightly better in that sued is temporary and burning in Hell is permanent. How is it not the same fear mongering?
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari