RE: Open borders
July 18, 2019 at 9:47 am
(This post was last modified: July 18, 2019 at 9:55 am by Mister Agenda.)
(July 17, 2019 at 10:40 am)onlinebiker Wrote:(July 17, 2019 at 10:30 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: We should issue a guest or worker visa to anyone who enters through a legal port of entry and gives finger prints, a DNA sample, and allows a photo ID to be made; who isn't known to be a felon. Voila, they are now documented, pay all their taxes, and employers can't threaten them with deportation if they don't work under minimum wage. If they commit crimes, we already have their fingerprints, DNA, and photo in our databases; which would not only facilitate catching them, it would likely be a powerful deterrent. Since they would be here on visas, they can still be deported if necessary. The BP wouldn't have to be on the lookout for would-be berry-pickers and dishwashers, anyone trying to bypass that easy means of entry probably really is a bad hombre.Ahhh.. Insults..
That would not only be more humane than what we're doing now, it would be more secure.
Did you, or did you just pull it out of your ass?
You seemed authoritative on what did and what did not figure into the accounting numbers.
Now.- either you do - or you do not have a breakdown on the data.
Considering your defensiveness and quick resort to insult - I am going to go out on a limb here and guess you do not actually have any of the accounting data to share - just a number - $750. You seem unwilling to divulge that figure's source.
Who is doing the rectal acquisition here?
You're the one who claimed it included the expense of finding, arresting, and transporting them. I'd say it's you if you can't back that up. You made a claim. I don't believe you. The $750 is supposed to be for housing the detainees, there's no reason to think it includes those other items. Where did you get that 'information' from again?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.