RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 3, 2019 at 11:32 pm
(This post was last modified: August 3, 2019 at 11:38 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
@Amerok
Are you able to elaborate?
Given that I'm new and you're a veteran, wouldn't you agree that a short response explaining where I'm wrong is more useful than one labeling it as old?
Hmm.
Wouldn't you agree that a topic I'm very familiar with is a good way to test out a new and unfamiliar forum? Of course.
Are you able to elaborate?
Given that I'm new and you're a veteran, wouldn't you agree that a short response explaining where I'm wrong is more useful than one labeling it as old?
Hmm.
(August 3, 2019 at 11:29 pm)LostLocke Wrote: Still bringing up the same old eye shit?
You didn't read the explanations at AR, so you come here in another "gotcha" attempt?
For those unawares, he ran around Atheist Republic with a raging hard on for the "impossible" evolution of the eye, and the rest.... well that's what you see here in this thread.
Wouldn't you agree that a topic I'm very familiar with is a good way to test out a new and unfamiliar forum? Of course.
