RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 5, 2019 at 2:10 am
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2019 at 2:15 am by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 5, 2019 at 2:06 am)Nay_Sayer Wrote:(August 4, 2019 at 10:48 pm)chimp3 Wrote: This forum asks that you give an intro post before you start making other posts! Read the rules. They are not that hard.
You have my deepest sympathies. It would appear the good lord FSM did not bless this one with any grey matter.
The rules don't seem to mention anything about giving an intro post; perhaps such a rule has been misplaced elsewhere in the forum?
(August 5, 2019 at 2:09 am)Grandizer Wrote: Inductive reasoning will always fail to account for a "black swan" somewhere (if there is any). Doesn't mean it's a mistake. After all, there doesn't have to be a black swan. And given what we do know, we do have the best explanation for diversity of life on this planet. Do you have a better one? If so, let's hear it.
At one point, epicycles was the best explanation for planetary motion.
