Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[John 6IX Breezy]

Why, why would it be s problem?  If we discover some new fact that won’t make every other fact immediately false.  That’s not how facts work.

In any case, we don’t know how consciousness or qualia work.  None of our best explanations contain anything troublesome for evolutionary theory.

To suggest that consciousness isn't biological, is to suggest it doesn't fall under any physical property biological organisms can possess. It would unravel most of our theories because they all account for only things that are strictly physical or biological. Its a little ironic that, even though I'm the theist, you guys are suggesting consciousness isn't biological for the sole purpose of protecting evolution from it lol.