RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 5:40 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2019 at 5:46 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 6, 2019 at 5:29 pm)wyzas Wrote: And what did you professor think about your position on evolution?
Well no, they never talked to my professor that I know of, it was just a threat of sorts. And to be clear, my issue is with having some kind of privacy issue, not the evolution topic. I don't need my professors getting emails from bitters strangers in a forum, and spamming them with comments about it. Its unprofessional, and ruins any opportunity for references and the like.
That being said, I don't know any of my professors personal beliefs on evolution. Professionally they all seem to treat it the same as everything else in science. Keep in mind most classes hardly touch on evolution. We're concerned with how the mind and brain work, not how it came to be. I have talked to some, casually, about issues with evolutionary psychology specifically and there seemed to be agreement on those issues.
(August 6, 2019 at 5:32 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: You can disagree if you like, I’m sure you’re capable of disagreeing with -anything-.
That’s an ability conferred to you by your baller brain.....but it remains a fact that the human eye isn’t the ultimate representative of its class. There are better eyes, often attached to shittier brains. Just as often as superior brains can be attached to shitty eyes.
Why do you go down these rabbit hole rants whenever I ask you to substantiate anything? Isn't it easier to just give the example so we can keep going?
