RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 7, 2019 at 11:00 am
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2019 at 11:01 am by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 7, 2019 at 9:02 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:
In scientific terms, space pixies would be a hypothesis at best, seeing as there is no evidence at all that space pixies exist. Do you not know the difference between the scientific definition of a theory and the colloquial definition?
No ma'am, I don't know the difference. I've never heard the colloquial definition, just the scientific one. But judging from the comments, there's a difference between the scientific definition and the atheistic definition.
The professor spoke about a theory of space pixies; as such he is speaking about a theory of space pixies, not a hypothesis. Those are two separate things.