RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 7, 2019 at 11:20 am
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2019 at 11:25 am by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 7, 2019 at 11:03 am)Grandizer Wrote:(August 7, 2019 at 9:02 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:
In scientific terms, space pixies would be a hypothesis at best, seeing as there is no evidence at all that space pixies exist. Do you not know the difference between the scientific definition of a theory and the colloquial definition?
If "space pixies" was a hypothesis, it would be a terrible one, scientifically speaking.
How so? Scientifically speaking, of course. What makes a good and bad hypothesis?