Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[GrandizerII]

No, we're not on the same page. You had to be corrected on your usage of the word "theory" in a scientific context.

And good to know you Google at the last minute, at least, lol.

So, are you saying theories are hypothesis that graduated to theories because of positive results? If we run the pixie experiment and the results support the hypothesis, it should be promoted to theory? Because if you're not saying that, then I don't see where I was corrected.

Stop with the games, dude, lol. You didn't know what a theory means (you probably do now thanks to Google), LFC had to correct you on that, and now you're trying to save face by acting like you were trying to make some clever rhetorical point.