RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 7, 2019 at 12:23 pm
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2019 at 12:24 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 7, 2019 at 12:08 pm)Grandizer Wrote:Quote:A theory of space pixies wouldn't be as accurate as another theory of gravity (depending on the theory), but yes, they would both still be just theories. So their validity would differ, but not their composition as theories.
In what way is a space pixies a scientific theory? If it's not scientifically-based, it can't be a scientific theory. It would just be speculations of an uneducated madman ...
Its a scientific theory in the way it was presented by Abaddon_ire. Its a theory that explains gravity as the result of these space pixies pressing us down to the surface. There's nothing unscientific about that. There's nothing in that statement to suggest its an unfalsifiable, and untestable theory.