Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[John 6IX Breezy]

Right, so we agree on the distinction between theory and hypotheses. The only thing I would disagree with you on, is that theories don't need to be well-established, in the sense that there is evidence for them. That's demonstrated by your acknowledgement that you don't demote theories if they turn out to be wrong. A theory can be completely an utterly false, and it remains a scientific theory.

You still think a theory is no different from a hypothesis ...

You have the wrong idea of what a theory is. You really do.

If we're both saying that theories and hypotheses are their own separate category, how am I wrong? We're agreeing lol. Either we're both right, or we're both wrong.

Read post #448 - https://atheistforums.org/thread-59486-p...pid1924981

You're echoing what I've said, while saying I'm wrong.