So I read a few pieces by Berbrier and to be honest, it sounds like a big conspiracy theory.
It's not science, it's opinion, based on the work of other people's opinions.
Why is this not considered propaganda?
The guy's just a teacher, whom half of his students consider to be rude and that he conducts a shitty class.
The other half love him.
If I'm on the left, where do I go to get information about things that the left are doing and shouldn't be doing?
Am I going to get it on left sites? Of course not.
It wasn't until I explored the right that I realised how much the left lies.
I've seen proof of it over and over again.
Of course, I already knew that the right lies, so I only glean information that is irreputable.
How can you be unsusceptible to propaganda if you're not checking out both sides?
Calling people out for having viewed information from the other side and then calling them names is effectively bullying, to make them stay on this side of the fence.
And the fact that it's being done in little gangs raises the bully factor.
It's not science, it's opinion, based on the work of other people's opinions.
Why is this not considered propaganda?
The guy's just a teacher, whom half of his students consider to be rude and that he conducts a shitty class.
The other half love him.
If I'm on the left, where do I go to get information about things that the left are doing and shouldn't be doing?
Am I going to get it on left sites? Of course not.
It wasn't until I explored the right that I realised how much the left lies.
I've seen proof of it over and over again.
Of course, I already knew that the right lies, so I only glean information that is irreputable.
How can you be unsusceptible to propaganda if you're not checking out both sides?
Calling people out for having viewed information from the other side and then calling them names is effectively bullying, to make them stay on this side of the fence.
And the fact that it's being done in little gangs raises the bully factor.
