Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[Abaddon_ire]

Oh, stop with the lies. You know full well as you posted that it is Comfort and his baloney. If you really were unaware, you would never have made such a guess.

Comfort argued that the banana was designed by god to fit human anatomy. Embarassingly for him, it was pointed out that the banana had been genetically manipulated by humans to be what it is today. He even tried to pretend that it was part of a comedy routine when he was so embarrassingly found out.

But you clearly knew all of this before you posted. So what is your particular motivation for dishonesty?

Correct, knowing about Ray Comfort is why I assumed he's the referent of banana man. However, I'm unfamiliar with his story about male dogs. Therefore, asking Rahn127 to tell me the story is a reasonable thing to do, wouldn't you agree?

Bull. Given that it is one of Comfort's goto arguments against evolution, I am not buying the notion that you have never heard of it.

ETA: And now that Rahn has posted it, you can't claim to be unfamiliar with it.