Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[Pat Mustard]

You're saying English is purely psychological. That's false.

Consider the difficulty of understanding a newly discovered stone tablet with some imaginary ancient language. They appear to us as scribbles because that's all they are. The language itself is lost with the minds of the civilization in which it existed.

If you're not a fundagelical christard as you claim, then why use as your name one of the passages from the gospel of john?

---

Consider the difficulty of understanding a newly discovered stone tablet with some imaginary ancient language. They appear to us as scribbles because that's all they are. The language itself is lost with the minds of the civilization in which it existed.

Seriously?

That’s all they are?

They’re often the thoughts and daily goings on of people in a list culture long gone.

They give us insights to their culture, their laws, and how they lived their lives.

Dismissing them as “squiggles” is an insult to those who came before us and those of us who are interested in these ancient peoples, as well as those who dedicate their lives learning about them.

Well in the christian fuckhead's example they are squiggles actually. He is talking about an imaginary language, just like the stuff he hears every week down below at the pentecostal scam house.