Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[John 6IX Breezy]

Consider the difficulty of understanding a newly discovered stone tablet with some imaginary ancient language. They appear to us as scribbles because that's all they are. The language itself is lost with the minds of the civilization in which it existed.

If you're not a fundagelical christard as you claim, then why use as your name one of the passages from the gospel of john?

Well, this is a good example of why a language exists within the mind and not the world. My username has nothing to do with any passages, but given my ongoing point, we would expect discrepancies to arise between the meaning I gave the words John 6IX Breezy, and the meaning your brain has produced as a result. Given that the scribbles are void of meaning.