RE: Arguments against Soul
September 23, 2019 at 4:23 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2019 at 4:28 pm by Aegon.)
(September 23, 2019 at 4:05 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:(September 23, 2019 at 2:00 pm)Aegon Wrote: Woah, watch it there.
Why?
Are you inferring that those are good music?
Jazz is objectively good, I'll fight you on this. I'll die on this cross Valk I swear.
(September 23, 2019 at 3:28 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Two facts must be observed:
1) The existence of an immaterial soul could be easily established by modern science, namely, remote viewing of concealed objects.
2) An immaterial soul contradicts the Conservation Laws -- Energy, Electric charge, Momentum and Angular Momentum.
I think you're giving modern science too much credit by thinking the existence of an immaterial soul can be "easily established." Remind me how much we understand our own consciousness? Don't know if what you implied is a good test for the soul is a very good test for the soul.
Not saying I think there is a tangible soul - I don't - but come on. Humble yourself a little there.