(October 5, 2019 at 2:23 pm)EgoDeath Wrote:(October 5, 2019 at 6:01 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: The hotel isn't responsible for firearms sales, Brian. No one has said they are. They weren't sued for selling firearms.
They were sued for having such stunningly inept security measures that they allowed a guest in their hotel to stockpile an arsenal in two of their rooms.
Boru
So what's the solution? Mandatory room searches in hotel rooms?
I don't want to live in a country where security takes complete and utter precedence over privacy. It's not paranoid to want privacy. It's not a conservative thing. It's human. I don't want people going through my shit, regardless of how innocuous the things I'm carrying are.
I agree, so the Hotel isn't responsible. The firearm CEOs and GOP has set up a long term policy system that allows everyone else to be blamed for their fear marketing which is nothing more than a racket to protect firearm CEO'S profits.
If America wants less firearm violence, the best solution is for the makers and shops to give a shit how many they make and where they end up by better vetting at the time of sale.
It is a vile argument to me, to have an inefficient and more costly reactionary climate after the fact.
It costs tax payers more to react than to prevent. And you are right. Even in the private sector. If the argument is to beef up security, and that should apply to any and all businesses, from a profit standpoint, that drives up costs to both the business and the consumer.