RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
October 9, 2019 at 12:41 pm
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2019 at 12:41 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(October 9, 2019 at 12:39 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(October 9, 2019 at 12:22 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: You understand sending them back to the makers will have largely the same effect as selling them to scrap metal, right?
When they sell them to scrap dealer, the makers of the guns still realizes the profit, and it would not affect their future gun production.
If they go back to the maker, the makers will have to credit Dicks for their value, which will leave a hole in their balance sheet, which they will have to fill by putting these guns on the market again where they will take the place of the maker's own future production?
Typically spray means automatic.
If rapid repeat of trigger pull constitute "spray" than everything that does not require manual operation of the bolt would be a spray weapon.
Hair trigger has nothing to do with rate of fire. It has to do with accuracy of the gun and how much the act of pulling the trigger upsets the aim. Mass shooting doesn't involve precision aiming.
HOLY CRAP.......
I am sooooo done, and beyond spray or handgun! It is literally a matter of ease of access and flooded market. But when one side cant even get on board with banning battlefield weapons, what do you want me to say?
America has an unhealthy obsession with all types of firearms. No other westernized first world country comparable to America has anything close to our firearm violence. The issue isn't about rights, it has always been about one industry scaring the shit out of the public needlessly to protect the profits of one industry.
(bold mine)
Does the US have a problem with privately owned anti-tank missiles?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax