(October 9, 2019 at 6:57 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(October 9, 2019 at 3:40 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: So they got rid of the weapons LEAST likely to kill people?
I guess that's "Poetlogical".....
Or they got rid of the weapons that are designed most to kill a bunch of people, and are less optimal for legitimate purposes like hunting or self-defense. Here was a quote I found from someone with experience as a hunter and a soldier talking about the M-16's use in both categories:
Quote:I served in the military and the M16A2/M4 was the weapon I used for 20 years. It is first and foremost designed as an assault weapon platform, no matter what the spin. A hunter does not need a semi-automatic rifle to hunt, if he does he sucks, and should go play video games. I see more men running around the bush all cammo’d up with assault vests and face paint with tricked out AR’s. These are not hunters but wannabe weekend warriors.
A bit more information: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016...actly.html
Yup.. ALWAYS believe everything what someone on the internet tells you - if it agrees with what you already decided anyway......
....
Don' t tell a hunter what he needs to hunt.
It's none of your business.
Especially when you know nothing about.the subject.
Which I'm betting you don't.
Have you killed a deer? 20 deer? 100 deer?
Honestly - I lost count decades ago.
But I just finished dinner. Venison spaghetti. It was delicious.
And I don' t need your twink opinion of how I go about it.