So I just got done reading Feser's section on the transcendentals. A lot of it was clear, but perhaps I should go back and reread it because I didn't exactly get how "truth" or "good" is convertible with "being". Clearly we are not fully "good" or "true", but does this mean we are not fully "being"?
I see the next section is specifically on final causality. Hoping to get more clarity on final causality as I read this next section.
I see the next section is specifically on final causality. Hoping to get more clarity on final causality as I read this next section.